UPDATED as of 1/31/14: Both components of the new bell schedule, the seven-period day and the advisement/homeroom period, have passed. Stay tuned for further updates.
University High School (UHS)’s regular six-period schedule will be altered for the next school year.
79 percent of staff members voted to change the current schedule to a seven-period schedule, and 65 percent voted for the addition of a designated home room. All teachers had the opportunity to vote.
The seven-period bell schedule will consist of an optional zero period beginning at 7:00 a.m. For students who decide not to take a zero period, first period will begin at 8:00 a.m.
On Mondays and Tuesdays, each period will be 54 minutes long instead of 58 minutes. Lunch will take place after fourth period, and snack will be after second period.
On Wednesday, zero period and first period block will be before office hours and snack. However, office hours will be shortened to half an hour to accommodate for the zero period block.
The Thursday schedule will remain relatively similar to the current Thursday schedule. On Friday, zero period will start on 7:05 am, and each class will be 49 minutes due to the addition of homeroom after second period.
Students do not have to take seven periods, but if they want to do so, the additional class must be an elective class. Also, classes that occur after school will be considered as zero period classes, and students will be able to take those classes within the school day. Two years ago, the eight-period schedule was proposed but denied.
Sofya Ogunseitan (So.) said, “If kids in Orchestra or Choir wanted to play a sport, they would be able to, since those classes would happen before school and sports take place after school.”
“Students have a lot on their plate with their six periods, and some of them have to come back for a seventh period, so having that embedded in the school day is a major benefit to them. I hope we can further track student performance and stress level next year and the following year to see if these benefits that we think will happen are really happening,” said Mr. Joseph Huber (Science Dept.).
Ms. Nora Seager (Social Science Dept.) said, “I’m not 100% sold on the fact that it will allow students to take new classes. It will help a certain group of students, but not a lot of kids. However, I still do see a large number of benefits from this.”
The homeroom is a 35-minute period every Friday where events such as IMPACT meetings, assemblies and counselor meetings would be held. All full-time teachers and administrators will have a homeroom. Students will have the same homeroom teacher until they graduate.
Mr. Matthew Pate (Admin.) said, “One of the things that came back on a student survey that was alarming to me was that 30 percent of students said that they did not have a meaningful relationship with an adult on campus. I’m not saying that the addition of the homeroom is the magic bullet for that, but we want something in our system that allows for the fostering of meaningful relationships outside of an academic setting.”
Ms. Nicole Bradshaw (Math Dept.) said, “I have a lot of stuff going on during fifth period with announcements and Univision. Now, my fifth period is just fifth period, and I don’t have to worry about that. I think homeroom could be fun because we can do activities and turn it into something more competitive. Also, if I’m going to have that student for four years, I am going to get close to that student.”
The new schedule will be implemented for the 2014-2015 year. However, if there are problems, the schedule may return to the regular six-period day.
By REEMA BZEIH
Staff Writer
Categories:
UPDATED: UHS passes new bell schedule
January 29, 2014
2
0
Donate to Sword & Shield
$180
$1000
Contributed
Our Goal
Your donation will support the student journalists of University High School. Your contribution will allow us to purchase equipment and cover our annual website hosting costs.
Matthew Pate, Assistant Principal • Feb 25, 2014 at 8:06 pm
I understand John Doe’s concern. Stress was a huge topic of conversation with the committee and the staff as a whole. We dedicated a few evenings for parents and students to come and discuss this very topic.
The thinking here has many dimensions, but first and foremost adding a period is not designed for students to add another academic class. Rather, students can take a 7th class if it is a performing art (i.e. instrumental music, drama, or choir) or class that is of service to the school (i.e. yearbook/video yearbook, journalism. or ASB). It is not for the student that wants to add another AP class. We want students to be able to have the ability to take one of these types of classes if they wish. We aim to have students try other things they otherwise would not have room for in their schedule. We desire to make available experiences a student may otherwise not have in high school. About 350 students currently come after school into the evening at least once (but many more than once) a week to partake in classes that should be available during the regular school day.
As to your point about “teachers stubbornly want the new program implemented”, we have had numerous conversations, surveys, and meetings with all stakeholders to gather information regarding the needs of all involved. As decision makers, it is our obligation to hear from the constituents and take ALL the information into account. I understand if you do not think this is a perfect solution. I am pretty sure it is not a perfect solution as nothing will satisfy everyone at the same time. However, with all input, the committee members who developed this plan have spent many hours considering, creating, presenting, and honing the ideas. There has been a great deal of dialog, debate, ideas, and critical input that went into this final product. I believe this to be a very elegant outcome and I believe the committee and the teachers deserve praise and kudos for making the hard choices to make this change a reality. It is good for kids.
Likewise, if you would like to discuss this in more detail or if you have any other questions, I encourage you to come find me or one of my colleagues to discuss the many dimenstions of this new plan.
John Doe • Feb 2, 2014 at 12:00 am
I’m opposed to the new bell schedule for multiple reasons. I don’t think that the people in charge of implementing this program understand that by forcing students to trade sleep for an extra class, they really aren’t reducing any stress. Uni is known for being an environment filled with academic rigor and students who are extremely competitive for colleges. By adding an extra class, the administration is essentially allowing various new loophole to appear. For example, someone who would take 5 academic class and one elective (language, asb, art, ect.) can now take 6 academic classes and one elective. If the teachers/principle wants to argue that the additional class is purely option, they would only be half right. A majority of Uni’s population(asains) would feel the need to take that 7th class in order to appear more presentable to colleges. If the students themselves don’t feel the need, then their parents would more than likely force them to take an additional class. Therefore, those exact same students, whom you hoped to relieve of stress, now have an extra academic class and 30 minutes of less sleep.
So what would be a solution to this problem? As a student, I am extremely frustrated that the teachers are try to help us without knowing what we want. If this change is really for our own good, then why are the students not allowed to vote and help decide what is best for them? If the teachers stubbornly want the new program implemented, then at least move the starting time for zero period back to 7:30, or limiting academics classes to a maximum of 5(although limiting classes would cause quite an uproar.) I like the idea of a homeroom but at the same time, I dislike the fact that Wednesday office hours are cut short by 15 precious minutes. In addition, IMPACT and anything that resembles it, needs to be scrapped. The start time of school needs to be pushed back preferably to 8:30 everyday.
If I was unclear on any points or any of my arguments have flaws in them, please reply to my comment so that I may clear up any misunderstandings.